| 1 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-compatibility -fsyntax-only -verify %s |
| 2 | |
| 3 | namespace basic { |
| 4 | struct C { |
| 5 | static void foo2() {} |
| 6 | }; |
| 7 | template <typename T> |
| 8 | struct A { |
| 9 | typedef C D; |
| 10 | }; |
| 11 | |
| 12 | template <typename T> |
| 13 | struct B : A<T> { |
| 14 | void foo() { |
| 15 | D::foo2(); // expected-warning {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'; unqualified lookup into dependent bases of class template 'B' is a Microsoft extension}} |
| 16 | } |
| 17 | }; |
| 18 | |
| 19 | template struct B<int>; // Instantiation has no warnings. |
| 20 | } |
| 21 | |
| 22 | namespace nested_nodep_base { |
| 23 | // There are limits to our hacks, MSVC accepts this, but we don't. |
| 24 | struct A { |
| 25 | struct D { static void foo2(); }; |
| 26 | }; |
| 27 | template <typename T> |
| 28 | struct B : T { |
| 29 | struct C { |
| 30 | void foo() { |
| 31 | D::foo2(); // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'}} |
| 32 | } |
| 33 | }; |
| 34 | }; |
| 35 | |
| 36 | template struct B<A>; // Instantiation has no warnings. |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | |
| 39 | namespace nested_dep_base { |
| 40 | // We actually accept this because the inner class has a dependent base even |
| 41 | // though it isn't a template. |
| 42 | struct A { |
| 43 | struct D { static void foo2(); }; |
| 44 | }; |
| 45 | template <typename T> |
| 46 | struct B { |
| 47 | struct C : T { |
| 48 | void foo() { |
| 49 | D::foo2(); // expected-warning {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'; unqualified lookup into dependent bases of class template 'C' is a Microsoft extension}} |
| 50 | } |
| 51 | }; |
| 52 | }; |
| 53 | |
| 54 | template struct B<A>; // Instantiation has no warnings. |
| 55 | } |
| 56 | |